ll ll ll
home

ll The Panhandle
Dallas/Fort Worth
East Texas
ll Austin
West Texas ll
Houston
San Antonio ll
ll
The Valley
Home
Newswire
Events
Articles
Blogs
Message Boards
Links
U.S. Art Headlines
Video
About Us
Contact
Subscribe
Latest Comment
Art-Life
Found your commen...

Amon Carter goes ...
Precisely; and wh...

Amon Carter goes ...
yes, if art worth...

Art-Life
Getting philosoph...

bottom
 

Feature

Utopian Semblances in the work of Noah Simblist PDF Print E-mail
by Charissa N. Terranova   
February 2007
The events of 9-11 made Americans aware of their alien status in the world. We are foreigners in a world of foreigners and we are strangers to ourselves. In keeping with such personal disaffection, the professor-artist-writer Noah Simblist makes art that propels the viewer into a gridlock of political debate and self-questioning.

Image
Noah Simblist
Home-land
2007
Video stills
I remember being in Vancouver as part of a teaching gig during that time. I was slightly inebriated at a party the weekend following the ugly event, but I meant it when I told a skeptical Canadian, "The American way is the Jewish way, and vice versa.” At the time, my comments were driven by a profound sense of solidarity with Israel, not to mention a longstanding titillation with Jewish men. Two wars and many American miscalculations later, I hold steady to my position. The American way is the Jewish way, yes, pragmatically speaking, because the state of Israel is a reality with a century of history and because it is a democracy. Also, the American way is the Jewish way because Israel, like America, engages in preemptive pugilism. As a Palestinian voice in Simblist’s soundwork Homeland says, “We didn’t commit the Holocaust, so why have they taken vengeance on us?” A better, if not tit-for-tat, logic would’ve had a post-WWII Israel appropriating land from the Bavarians. Israel’s logic of taking territory in the Middle East when the Holocaust occurred in Germany and Poland is not unlike America’s rationale for war in Iraq. Waging war with Iraq in response to 9-11, when none of the terrorists who took down the Twin Towers were Iraqi, serves only to fortify a different kind of logic — the logic of anarchic outcomes.

Image
Noah Simblist
Home-land
2007
Photocopied pamphlets
Edition 200
Simblist works in the claustrophobic yet tumultuous interstices of this political mayhem: a reformed Jew in Christian America, a vibrant young conceptual artist teaching in an art department of old-school traditionalists at SMU and an artist-citizen engaging the world by probing its core political wound. This is his identity. As homo faber, he is a painter pushing and prodding the medium to a new state of limberness. Simblist sees the moving images, sounds and painted walls in his work as part of painting’s collective bag. His work is an infusion bearing the apotheosis of painting as a full-body, full-mind experience. In similarly stretchy fashion, Simblist moves beyond the tiresome dyads that once stifled painting, beyond the antinomies of figural vs. abstraction and politically engaged vs. autonomous. One might deduce that Simblist avoids all categories, but there’s one he just cannot escape: utopian. He’s a utopian thinker not so much in denial as in pursuit of a utopian vision that is more just, available and restless in its dialectic.

He makes his restless utopianism legible in a host of powerful symbols: the cube, the Star of David and the cross. By integrating such readily identifiable signs into a field of monochromatic vertical stripes, Simblist destabilizes these universal icons, leveling them to a ground of almost arbitrary semiosis. In his own words, “Any universal idea is bound to be infected by the ideology of those in power.” Exhibited in a show curated by Vance Wingate at Dallas’ And/Or gallery, a series of simple, roughhewn drawings hint at Simblist’s talent for mediating symbols. In graphite and yellow gouache, A Tower of Babel Made from Cubic Kaaba Modules Falls from the Weight of Yellow Stars (2006) shows Simblist negotiating age-old signs of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. It is a simple rendering that at first brings to mind the neo-geo abstraction of Peter Halley. Upon closer scrutiny, Simblist’s geometric abstraction gives way to loaded symbolism with highly specific meaning.

Image
Noah Simblist
Home-land
2007
Installation view
Wallpaper, LCD TV and DVD
In choosing to render abstraction by way of cubes, Stars of David and crosses, Simblist has made the work very precise, a rumination on the conundrum of belief and the socio-mental burden of religion. Seemingly only so many golden arches of religious iconography, they are incisive and heated signs, at once love- and hate-mongering beacons. The cube is perfect Platonic form. It has been the preoccupation of artists from Robert Ryman to Sol Lewitt. It is also the shape of the Kaaba in Mecca, the holiest place in Islam. The six-pointed star is a sign of Jewish cohesion. Ancient Romans, Christians and Nazis rendered it in yellow with the intention of shrouding Judaism in shame. Ancient Romans used crucifixion as a means of execution. Today the cross is the sign of belief and salvation for Christians. And the vertical stripes of Simblist’s work nimbly play between the one-thing-after-another of minimalism, the conceptualist high jinks of Daniel Buren and the patterned pajamas worn by Jews in Nazi concentration camps. In laying bare the homology of high-art repetition (Donald Judd and Buren) and the coding of genocide (striped pajamas), Simblist has made old arguments of autonomy seem like philosophie dans le boudoir — out of touch and pointless. His use of loaded icons to constitute a field of abstraction upends the hoary idea that abstraction is a prism for disinterested spirituality. While negotiating spirituality through abstraction, he nevertheless comes down on the side of materialism, showing us that spirit and soul are always about our sensual embodiment and being in the world.

Image
Noah Simblist
Home-land
2007
Installation view
Wall painting, CD player, headphones and pamphlets
Simblist’s talents for destabilizing the viewer’s comfortable familiarity with traditional religious iconography are most poignantly felt in his multimedia work. The centerpiece of Al Nakba (2006), an Arabic term for “catastrophe,” is a single-channel video in which Simblist combined painting and moving images — renderings of religious symbols on stripes are interspersed with footage of the Holocaust, Palestinian military marches and news clips of violent skirmishes between the Israelis and the Palestinians. Simblist installed the video with his paintings atop a wall of meticulously painted stripes in New, Newer, Newest, an exhibition at the Pollock Gallery of work by new faculty members in the division of art at SMU. Simblist’s video-painting verges on a full-fledged environment. The more Simblist goes in the direction of transforming painting into an enveloping polysensual experience, the more powerful his work becomes. A case in point is his installation of Homeland in the New Works Space at the McKinney Avenue Contemporary in Dallas. A monitor shows a short loop of anti-Semitic clips, most of which come from the early twentieth century. Simblist has transferred the stripes of concentration camp uniforms to the wall behind the monitor, creating a minimalist-cum-genocidal interior decoration. Making headsets unnecessary, the sounds of voices emanate in a barely audible hum from the monitor. Across the small room are two headsets with CD player with different tracks to listen to and stacks of texts written by Simblist. He has transformed the New Works Space into a somber laboratory for political rumination. Simblist’s message is that hard-held memories have now become the Zionist homeland. Visitors walk away with a lesson on both the power of memory and the somewhat untapped agency of healthy forgetting.

Above all else — beyond being a professor of art at SMU, a young Jew in Christian America and a painter — Simblist is a citizen of the world. He is a utopian in search of a better, less totalizing (yet extensive) vision of what the late philosopher Jacques Derrida called international friendship.

Image

Charissa N. Terranova is an Associate Proffessor at SMU and a Contributing Editor to Glasstire.

Add Comment add feed
ugh...
written by b.s. on February 9, 2007, 7:33 am

how can you see that much in those boring paintings?

minimalist-cum-genocidal interior decoration? come on, yer just huffing paint and blowing smoke up his ass.

whoa, Chariissa...
written by titus_obrien on February 9, 2007, 4:59 pm

re: "The American way is the Jewish way, and vice versa.” I just have to express my discomfort with your very holly-go-lightly lumping Judaism whole cloth in with Zionism, in with being American, in with Neo-con imperialism. Jews do not by any stretch all believe in the state of Israel, nor all Israelis with "preemptive pugilism", nor at least half of Americans with how our president is mis-handling our foreign poilcy. Maybe you could assert that the American way might be the Israeli way, if you're wont to lump. The two nations are inarguably closely tied. Though the phrase seems mainly geared to stir up sh it. Which shocks, coming from you!
I generally agree with the rest of your estimation of Noah and this show. It's a good one, by one of Texas' better artists. I think he's genuinely breaking new ground.

well...
written by bacon on February 10, 2007, 9:35 am

i think your show looks good. but, it borrows too heavily from sol lewitt to be considered accomplished, mature work. throwing in religious iconography just makes it sophomoric in a dry, humorless way. you are someone whose work has some potential. i hope that this potential will be realized and that you will not have to depend on reviews from authors who are too close to you to see the merits and the shortcomings of your work.

misunderstood
written by titus_obrien on February 11, 2007, 9:43 am

I think both of Simblist's critics here are *exactly* missing the point. Any resemblance between Simblist's work and some high modern/minimalist's, or interior decoration, is a totally intentional tactic to initiate another discussion. I don't really understand how you can miss it as some errant theft or lack of imagination. "throwing in religious iconcography?" what? that's the substance of the work, not just some hook to make it look cool. He's taking the barren language of an abandoned (if rabidly lauded) aesthetic, and those ubiquitous/loaded symbols, and turning them on their heads, usng them in a really sharp, smart way (much more Hans Haacke than Sol Lewitt) . Not to mention the show is very moving. Did those critical here even see it, listen to it, read the texts? I doubt it. If so, you didn't get past the most casual glance.
And a lot of really good writing about art comes from those closest in- Greenberg on Pollock, Judd on Flavin, Smithson on Holt, etc.
Your criticisms show potential. We hope that this potential will be realized and you will next time actually see the art that you are so antsy to dismiss.

titus, perhaps what you and ms. terranova suffer from is not inflated egos, but rather a conflict of interests
written by bacon on February 11, 2007, 3:28 pm

thanks what would have been a dismissive but perhaps more importantly, extremely amusing post. to the point, friends don't make the best critics of their friends' work. you wrote the review for the fw star telegram. terranova wrote the review for glasstire. neither of them are an accurate assessment of the artist. if the artist would like constructive criticism that will help him develop as an artist (a lifetime project), he will listen to me. if he simply wants to surround himself with yes-'people', who will sing only his praises, no matter how hollow the tune may ring, he'll listen to 'yous guys'. regardless, i don't have to take what you say at face value, and i don't have to be quiet about it, either. hugs and kisses, a.w.s. bacon, esquire

itus, perhaps what you and ms. terranova suffer from is not inflated egos, but rather a conflict of interest
written by bacon on February 12, 2007, 2:55 pm

thanks so much for your pretentiously dismissive, and extremely amusing post. to the point, friends don't make the best critics of their friends' work. you wrote the review for the fw star telegram. terranova wrote the review for glasstire. no doubt, terranova also wrote a piece for that rag they call the observer. none of your pre-planned comments are an accurate assessment of the work. if the artist would like constructive criticism that will help him develop as an artist (a lifelong project for everyone), he will listen to me. if he simply wants to surround himself with yes-'people', who will sing only his praises, no matter how hollow the tune may ring, he'll listen to 'yous guys'. regardless, i don't have to take what you say at face value, and i don't have to be quiet about it, either. the problem with the younger generation of 'deconstructionists' is that they seem to have sold their services to the highest bidder and are only in it for themselves, and their pitiful, little, pretentious cliques. hugs and kisses, a.w.s. bacon, esquire

keep working on it...
written by titus_obrien on February 13, 2007, 11:00 am

you'll get there. it's shaping up nicely.

conflict of interests rhetoric = a new review from titus o'brien or charissa terranova
written by bacon on February 13, 2007, 11:25 am

the problem with the younger generation of 'deconstructionists' (the term is meant as an insult. i offer this explanation in case you are as dense as you are pretentious and insincere) is that they seem to have sold their services to the highest bidder and are only in it for themselves, and their pitiful, little, pretentious cliques.

forgive me...
written by titus_obrien on February 13, 2007, 12:08 pm

for laughing a little. I don't think Chariissa is getting any richer than I am off our little art conspiracy racket, with the coterie of art stars we are currently grooming (hey, somebody show me the money!) And while Noah is a very cool dude and a talented artist, and I would welcome chances to spend more time with him, I don't really know him all that well. I wish we had a big pretentious clique. It sounds like fun. I'm mainly just at home trying to make art, and find some cash to pay for my wedding reception. Adjunct teaching, and making sort of dumb, unmarketably-oversize charcoal drawings, is (newsflash) not a get rich quick scheme.
Not to mention that you've probably just offended some Deconstructivists. I couldn't really live further from Derridasville. Though I would like to gently deconstruct that chip on your shoulder, and help convince you that you have nothing to fear, that Noah's show is quite admirable from some fairly objective criteria, and ...that you are loved.

plead poverty, deny any conflicts of interest and next, try to write in a way that disguises these conflicts without real reform
written by bacon on February 13, 2007, 12:13 pm

derrida didn't care much for the clowns who wanted to make his writing methods into a self serving, load of rhetoric. why should i?

huh?
written by titus_obrien on February 13, 2007, 12:21 pm

I'm so confused.
But I still love you, Bacon. In an general humanitarian, ignore all the stupidity kind of way.
Peace.

plead poverty, deny any conflicts of interest and next, try to write in a way that disguises these conflicts without real reform
written by bacon on February 13, 2007, 12:29 pm

noah's show does look good. but,it is not ready for prime time and he needs to move further away from the work of sol lewitt before he can find his own, unique 'voice'. and by the way, 'hybridity' is not something new that just sprang out of the latest whitney biennial. it has been explored fully and more successfully by mike kelly, tony oursler and paul mccarthy, who have all been at it since the 70's.

okay, you all agree he did good... now, hush.
written by sagebrush on February 13, 2007, 2:53 pm

:)

yeah.....
written by mammal on February 14, 2007, 1:44 pm

art that forces some socio-political statement or agenda makes me sleepy *yawn*
Happy Valentines! :)

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
Last Updated ( February 2007 )
 

 

Username
Password
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

© 2001 - 2007 Glasstire | P.O. Box 70408 | Houston, Texas 77270-0408
Glasstire is a 501(c)3 nonprofit corporation.

 

designed by Anthony Thompson Shumate