ll ll ll
home

ll The Panhandle
Dallas/Fort Worth
East Texas
ll Austin
West Texas ll
Houston
San Antonio ll
ll
The Valley
Home
Newswire
Events
Articles
Blogs
Message Boards
Links
U.S. Art Headlines
Video
About Us
Contact
Subscribe
Latest Comment
Art-Life
Found your commen...

Amon Carter goes ...
Precisely; and wh...

Amon Carter goes ...
yes, if art worth...

Art-Life
Getting philosoph...

bottom
 

Harping on AMOA's New Art in Austin
PDF Print E-mail
by Ivan Lozano   
March 2008
cheapart.jpg

 
The new issue of ...might be good has a very interesting review of AMOA's New Art in Austin by (...mbg editor) Claire Ruud and an interview with executive director Dana Friis-Hansen by Kate Green.

The Review of New Art in Austin raises some really good points about one of my main problems with the show: the installation. I completely agree with Ruud's singling out of the very distracting and counter-productive pairing of Jill Pangallo's Note To Self and Buster Graybill's Come Along Johnny. Leaving the weird male vs. female dichotomy this unfortunate pairing creates behind (as Ruud points out), I find that both pieces suffer from being so cramped together. It's really quite hard to appreciate the monumental scale of Graybill's sculpture or the intimate scope of Pangallo's installation. And that's without mentioning the other artist in the unfortunate little room: Sarah Sudhoff, whose photographs barely register because of the cramped quarters.

Then there's the other two artists whose work is really hurt by placement: Baseera Khan and Kurt Mueller. Both artist's work is placed next to the entrance where it's almost impossible to notice them. Especially in Mueller's case, his MLK karaoke American Dream just looks like misplaced A/V equipment shoved in a corner.

It will be very interesting to see how the show looks in the other venues it will be presented in. I hope ...might be good reviews the show a second time, with the same focus as the current review that (rightfully) fixates on installation problems and institutional critique.

And speaking of institutional critique, I'm a little weirded out by some of Friis-Hansen's comments in this week's ...might be good, especially when he is quoted calling New Art in Austin a “cheap feel-good show,” and when he mentions that his philosophy about AMOA is "to lower the threshold for coming to see shows as low as possible so that people can literally walk in off the street and feel welcome."

AMOA often feels like it has a low threshold, but I'm unsure whether this really is the best way to attract the "'creative class'—those involved in industries such as gaming, graphics, film or software" that Friis-Hansen wants to "tap." Calling a screening of short video documentaries a "film screening" will alienate people who know what film actually means and having a website that feels like it was made at the turn of the last century will alienate the graphics/software people, even if it was made on an open source platform developed by SFMOMA.
Add Comment add feed
Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
Last Updated ( March 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >

 

Username
Password
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

© 2001 - 2007 Glasstire | P.O. Box 70408 | Houston, Texas 77270-0408
Glasstire is a 501(c)3 nonprofit corporation.

 

designed by Anthony Thompson Shumate